Evidence workflow for citability
Source Discovery
Find the evidence behind citable claims
Surface primary sources, references, and supporting evidence that make pages easier for AI to trust and quote.
Strong claims often sit on weak sourcing
Pages lose trust when the evidence layer is thin or inconsistent. Teams spend too much time hunting sources manually.
- Claims are strong but references are weak or absent
- Editors and SMEs spend too much time finding support material by hand
- Trust signals vary wildly from one page to another
- It is hard to prove freshness or authority without the right sources
Claim to source coverage surfaced before publish
How Source Discovery works
- Review claims in context: Read the page against the authority model and spot places where stronger evidence is needed.
- Surface candidate sources: Find references and supporting material that can make key statements more trustworthy.
- Send evidence into the workflow: Pass sourced claims into verification and rewrite steps so the final page ships with stronger support.
Strengthen the evidence layer
A sourcing workflow designed for trust signals, not generic research notes.
- Reference suggestions: Surface candidate sources where the page needs stronger support.
- Evidence mapping: See which important claims are well-supported and which still need work.
- Review queue: Give editors and SMEs a clear queue of sourcing decisions to approve.
- Rewrite handoff: Move stronger evidence straight into claim correction and final rewrites.
Evidence before visibility
Source discovery strengthens factual support so AI and readers see a page as more trustworthy.
Give strong claims the evidence they deserve
Better sourcing makes every verification and rewrite workflow more effective.
